Author

Jensen Beeler

Browsing

The return of WorldSBK to the Czech Republic proved to be a race weekend to remember. Tensions between Jonathan Rea and Tom Sykes overflowed, Alex Lowes delivered on his long-held promise, and we saw flashes of brilliance from else on the World Superbike grid.

Kawasaki Tensions Overflow

That Rea and Sykes don’t like each other has been clear since the start of their tenure as teammates. The 2013 world champion had been the center of attention at the Kawasaki Racing Team for years, not to mention that Sykes developed the Kawasaki Ninja ZX-10R into the best package on the grid.

It allowed him to win races and become a consistent force at the front of the field. Since Rea joined in 2015 however, Sykes’ power has been eroded within the team and his potential on track has been limited.

Their dislike for one another has been clear to see for years, but on Sunday it boiled over.

After a clash on track that took Rea out of the race the 60-time race winner pinned the blame firmly at Tom’s feet, while Sykes’s felt his actions had been 100% clean.

Race Direction took no action against either rider, and declared it a racing incident. While Race Direction might view this as a closed incident, it is clear that it will be far from that for both riders and their team.

Sykes’ future has been the topic of conversation in recent months, and now the question will turn to whether Kawasaki are willing to tolerate tensions between riders, mechanics, and engineers for another two years.

They weren’t willing to do this with Sykes and Baz post-2014, and that led to the signing of Rea. Will they take a similar approach with Sykes? Only time will tell.

First of Many for Lowes

Speed has never been a question for Alex Lowes, but on Sunday he finally claimed his first career victory. The 2013 British Superbike champion became the 74th different winner in WorldSBK history – just two weeks after his teammate, Michael van der Mark, claimed his first career victories.

For Yamaha, the victories have been a long time coming, but for Lowes it was crucial to get the monkey off his back as quickly as possible. With his teammate having won races, that monkey could have become a Silverback very quickly.

Instead, the Englishman can enjoy the spoils of success, and arguably the biggest spoil is that parity remains the key word at Yamaha.

In racing, resources follow results, and if Van der Mark had gotten the better of Lowes in Race 2, the resources and focus of the team could have followed.

Instead, Lowes insured that the team knows they have two race-winners, and parity remains crucial as they look to develop the bike further.

Both riders have proven themselves to Yamaha, and the team will now be focused solely on confirming their futures, so that they can continue to progress in 2019.

For Lowes the relief of winning was clear to see as the emotions of over four years without winning came out.

“It’s funny because I’ve won races at Suzuka, in the last few years, and that’s important, but winning an individual race is different. On my cool down lap, it was a bit emotional, but I was back to myself when I got to parc fermé, but to see what it meant to so many people got the better of me!”

“I know how hard these guys all work, and I know the sacrifices that people have made for me, and that was what I was thinking when I saw them all afterwards.”

Potential Turning into Results

Aprilia is accustomed to winning in WorldSBK, but finally the potential of the bike is starting to come to the fore once again.

Luck has worked against the team this year, and Eugene Laverty’s injuries certainly cost them a lot of strong results, but finally the potential is being rewarded with points.

The team have said that they can’t sell potential to sponsors for 2019, but finally they’re delivering what they’re capable of. In the second half of the year, Aprilia certainly looks ready to make another step forward.

Photo: WorldSBK

This World Superbike story is made possible by our A&R Pro members. If you like reading WorldSBK stories on Asphalt & Rubber, you should consider supporting this content by signing up for A&R Pro.

Joan Mir is to move up to MotoGP next year, and will be racing in the factory ECSTAR Suzuki team, for at least the next two seasons.

The signing had been widely expected, as the name of Mir had been linked to Suzuki for the past month or so.

The Spanish youngster is highly rated throughout the MotoGP paddock, and been pursued by Honda and Ducati, as well as Suzuki, according to his manager.

Mir has been chosen over both current rider Andrea Iannone and veterans Jorge Lorenzo and Dani Pedrosa. Lorenzo had been linked to the ride since early this year, but in the end, Suzuki bosses back in Hamamatsu, Japan preferred to go with youthful potential over an established star.

Alex Rins, who will be starting his third season in MotoGP, is regarded as experienced enough to lead the development of the MotoGP project at the start of next season.

The signing of Mir puts Suzuki in a similar position to the one they found themselves in with Maverick Viñales. Viñales was then the hot young rider pursued by one and all, who impressed enough people at Suzuki to be snatched away by Yamaha once a seat there became available.

There are unsubstantiated reports that Suzuki have put a mechanism in place to protect themselves against a similar situation developing with Mir, should he meet with the same kind of success Viñales did. In effect, Mir’s deal with Suzuki could end up being closer to four years than two.

With Mir filling the second Suzuki seat, all of the factory seats in MotoGP are now taken. Attention will now turn to the Petronas SIC Yamaha project, and how quickly (or whether) that gets off the ground.

“As a Team we have always tried to look forward to long term development plans, which includes also making some bets on young riders that we feel can be an investment for the future,” said Shinichi Sahara, Suzuki’s MotoGP project leader.

“We did it in our debut year in 2015, we did it again in 2017 when we signed the debutant Alex Rins, who has been confirmed also this year, and we are further confirming this with the agreement with Joan Mir.”

“He is a young talent we would like to see grow and help us to grow the GSX-RR and the team with him. He is now involved in the Moto2 class and we definitely want him to enjoy the championship, but we are also eager to start working with him and see him debut in the top class. We believe in his skills.”

Source: Suzuki Racing

This article was originally published on MotoMatters, and is republished here on Asphalt & Rubber with permission by the author.

Out riding bikes, because that’s what we do, for this edition of “Gone Riding” it is the last three letters of the name “MV Agusta Turismo Veloce Lusso 800 SCS” that you want to pay most attention to.

Those three letters stand for “smart clutch system” and they represent the new semi-auto clutch technology that MV Agusta has developed with Rekluse for its street-going motorcycles, and it is the main reason that we are in Varese today, riding the Italian brand’s up-spec sport-tourer.

The Lusso line of the Turismo Veloce 800 features integrated panniers and semi-active suspension over the base model, and of course the SCS in the name adds the new clutch design, with its attractive clear clutch cover. The special clutch also adds €700 to the price tag, over the regular Lusso.

We have already had some seat time on the base model, a few years ago, and found the MV Agusta Turismo Veloce 800 to be a capable and fun sport bike that was comfortable for longer trips, though we would have liked a few more ponies coming out of the three-cylinder engine.

Getting to see this motorcycle again, our focus today will be on the changes that have been made with the new clutch and the move to Euro4 emission standards, as well as the more premium elements that come with the Lusso name.

Per our new review format, I will be giving you a live assessment of the MV Agusta Turismo Veloce 800 SCS right here in this article (down in the comments section), and there he will try to answer any questions you might have.

So, here is your chance to learn what it’s like to ride the Turismo Veloce 800 Lusso SCS, before even my own proper review is posted. As always, if I don’t know an answer, I will try to get a response from the MV Agusta personnel on-hand. So, pepper away.

You can follow our thoughts on the bike live via FacebookTwitter, and Instagram, and you can see what our colleagues are posting on social media by looking for the hashtags #TurismoVeloceSCS

Spec-Sheet Comparison of Relevant Models to the MV Agusta Turismo Veloce 800 Lusso SCS:

MV Agusta Turismo Veloce 800 Lusso SCS Triumph Tiger 800 Ducati Multistrada 950
Horsepower 108 hp 94 hp 111 hp
Torque 59 lbs•ft 58 lbs•ft 71 lbs•ft
Weight 423 lbs (dry) 458 lbs (dry) 453 lbs (dry)
Engine 798cc Three-Cylinder 800cc Three-Cylinder 937cc V-Twin
Price €21,390 €15,050 €13,990

Photo: MV Agusta

The concept of an auto-clutch is nothing new, and for dirt bike riders, products like those produced by Rekluse are virtually common place. But, on the sport bike side of things, the use and adoption of this technology is still relatively young.

We have seen scooters and other small-displacement machines use continuously variable transmission (CVT) technology before, and Honda is currently proudly touting its dual-clutch transmission (DCT) on several of its models, the latest being the new Honda Gold Wing, but what about the rest of the market?

Today we see that MV Agusta is the first brand to strike back in this space, debuting its “Smart Clutch System” (SCS) – an automatic clutch designed with sport bikes in mind, making it an option on the marque’s MV Agusta Turismo Veloce Lusso sport-tourer.

See what it has achieved off-road, it is not surprising to learn that MV Agusta developed the Smart Clutch System with Rekluse, partnering with the American brand to develop its Radius CX clutch for a sport-bike application.

Promising a clutch that won’t stall when you launch the bike forward, the Smart Clutch System is a simpler solution than CVT or DCT, for those looking to get rid of their clutch lever.

In a sport-touring application, SCS promises to be an added luxury as well, especially when coupled to MV Agusta’s up/down quickshift system.

Debuting first on the the MV Agusta Turismo Veloce 800 Lusso SCS motorcycle, we can expect to see MV Agusta’s auto-clutch on other models, most likely first on the other three-cylinder machines.

Right now, the SCS option adds €700 euros to the price tag of the Turismo Veloce Lusso.

Source: MV Agusta

In the final part of our series on test riders, (see also Part 1, with Mike Leitner, Part 2, with Davide Brivio, and Part 3, with Davide Tardozzi) an interview with Michele Pirro, Ducati’s workhorse and arguably the rider responsible for taking the concept of a test rider to a higher level.

Pirro’s path to Ducati ran through the CRT bikes, spending a year on a Honda-powered FTR bike with the San Carlo Gresini team in 2012, after graduating from Moto2.

In 2013, he was hired by Ducati to work as a test rider under Bernhard Gobmeier, who was brought in as head of Ducati Corse, after the Italian factory had been bought by Audi.

A year later, when Gigi Dall’Igna took over as Ducati Corse boss, Pirro was given even more responsibility in helping to turn the program around, which had lost its way in the years after Casey Stoner left Borgo Panigale.

Since then, Pirro has been charged with pushing forward the development of the bike. Pirro’s speed has been key to helping the Desmosedici improve, the Italian consistently capable of running in or around the top ten.

His best finish last year came at Misano, where he crossed the line in fifth, equaling his best result in MotoGP. Wildcards are just one way in which Pirro remains fast, he also races in the Italian CIV championship, which he wins with relative ease.

But his dream remains to return to MotoGP, and to have a shot at proving he is not just a great test rider, but a great MotoGP racer.

Andrea Dovizioso, who came to Ducati at the same time as Pirro, is clear about his importance as a test rider. “His work about test the rider is amazing, because he’s able to make a similar lap time, so we are very lucky to be in this condition. He is testing a lot.”

I spoke to Pirro at the 2018 Sepang test, on a day he was not testing the GP18. Pirro was very open about his aims and goals, and also about the process that had brought him to where he is today, and about the development he has engaged in for Ducati.

Q: You’re not riding today. Do you wish you were out there right now?

MP: Now it’s OK. My roots, in the beginning when I started [in 2013], when I came to Ducati, only the first year I was riding to test the MotoGP, but normally, in the second year I would race all season.

But it was very difficult, especially after Valentino [Rossi], the bike is not fast, there were many problems. And after one year, Gigi came, and started a new era, a new system for working.

So Gigi spoke with me to continue this route as a test rider and some wildcard races, and as a replacement rider if a rider crashed.

For sure, for me it’s not so easy, because my mentality is as a racer. And when I raced, the results were good. This for me is good, but when I’m not racing, I’m very angry, because my level is high.

But OK, I’m happy, because the bike improved with me, with Dovi, because Dovi came to Ducati with me, and now every year, the bike is very consistent, and this is very important for my job.

Q: So you feel pride seeing results of other riders racing the bike you helped make?

MP: It’s clear. People don’t understand the real situation. But we do a big job, the people inside Ducati and the test team, because it’s the first time that the new parts arrive in the track, the first time I’m using them, and the people of the test team.

When the bike is OK, it’s possible for the official riders to try them. But in any case, my speed is like the official riders. This is important, because in this case, the old bike and the new bike are different, the difference is very small, but if you don’t push at the limit, this is difficult to understand.

Because it’s maybe only less than one tenth that the bike is better or not better, but if the lap time was not fast, if you lose three or four seconds, you don’t understand if it’s better.

Q: You can’t understand the limit if you are 2 seconds slower?

MP: Exactly.

Q: How do you keep so fast, when you are not racing?

MP: My ambition is to go fast every time, to improve my riding style, my speed. Because my ambition is to race one season in one team for a whole season, and try to go fast in all situations, in the same team, same bike, same people.

Not change every race, every time. Now I think my situation, I have been for many years in MotoGP, I understand the electronics, the chassis, understand very well the whole package, but never in the last three or four years could I try for one complete season with one bike to improve my speed, to only work on my speed.

When I’m riding the bike normally, the conditions are always changing. Because OK, one time I’m testing, one time I’m racing. One time I’m testing different parts.

One time I’m testing with Pirelli, with the Panigale, with the V4. So it’s impossible to find the last three or four tenths, because I don’t have time to understand very well the limit.

Q: Because you are always on something completely different?

MP: This is important, because my limit is very high, but I don’t know if it’s possible to reduce this gap, this three or four tenths, if I stay one complete season or two or three months using the same bike, the same tires. I don’t know. But I never tried. But I hope in the future this possibility is realized.

Q: But some teams must sometimes ask you to ride for them, do Ducati have to persuade you to stay?

MP: When I speak, OK, but I think that the situation is not so easy. So last year, we arrived very close to winning the championship with Dovi, but two years ago the situation was not so easy.

But now for sure, I like riding the Ducati, because it’s fast, not many problems, this makes me happy. But my alternative in this moment doesn’t exist…. [laughs]

Q: Do you think that teams don’t understand your speed enough because you are not racing very often?

MP: I think the data is very clear. The data, especially when I have the opportunity to compare with other riders, when it’s possible to check the real situation. And I think that the team knows the real situation.

But for sure if I don’t have another opportunity to change my position, it’s difficult. Because normally, if like Iannone two years ago, his crash in Misano, and it wasn’t possible for him to race for two races, and I’m racing and finishing two times, maybe sixth and tenth in Aragon.

Because of these points, it’s possible to arrive top three in the team championship. For sure, it’s important to have three fast riders normally.

OK, I’m a test rider, but I don’t like this name. I think that if now if I can stay on track all of the races, it’s possible for me to stay in the top five or top ten, because every race, my position in practice is top five, top six, and in the race, top ten every time.

This is very important, because I only race three races in one year.

Q: Your motivation during a test is then to go fast and prove you deserve a ride?

MP: This is the key of my improving. Every test, every session, when I’m alone in the track, but my brain, the focus is go faster. Go faster, because when I’m racing, it’s possible to keep the gap not too big, the difference not too big.

Because if you don’t push at the maximum in the test, when I arrive in the race weekend, you are not ready.

Q: But it must be more difficult to go fast when you are on track alone, without a target to chase?

MP: Yes, it’s clear. But for sure you have the data. You have the data to compare to the past, the lap time or the data of a computer simulation. But normally, the motivation of a weekend of racing is much easier. Because when you are riding alone, it’s not the same, not the same situation.

Q: Is it enjoyable to ride a bike so fast, or is it racing that you need?

MP: For me, if I stop racing, my level will go down. This is important. My next race is in May, my next race in a normal situation. Now it’s January. If you don’t think you have an objective in May to go fast to aim at a top five or the top level, the motivation goes down. If you’re only a test rider, I think it’s impossible.

Normally, I’m called many times by other companies, but if I feel it’s not fast or it’s not possible to race, it’s not possible to go to another company, because I would be only a test rider like Colin [Edwards]. But I am young, it’s possible for me to race still. I’m available. This is very important.

Q: Did it help when you were racing in the Italian championship?

MP: Normally for sure, the training when I stay at home, it’s important to train, because if you are not training, it’s impossible to ride the MotoGP bike. Normally it’s not more than one test in one month, and one test is two or three days.

But two or three days it’s impossible to be fast, considering my first race is in May. To arrive in Mugello with ten days on the bike is not too much. OK, it’s possible to go training with motocross, with Supermoto, but racing, the races like the CIV are the best combination.

But it’s more difficult for me, because this bike, I never use it compared to the MotoGP. I only use it in the race weekend. And on the MotoGP I make many kilometers.

When I arrive at the CIV races, I’m the reference for these people. And for sure, these people training with this bike with these tires, and for sure, when I get on the bike, the first three or four laps, it feels like the bike is broken, the brakes don’t work, the tire is too soft, the chassis is not possible to change a lot… Just focus to stay on the bike and keep the improvement.

Q: Tardozzi said your comments are very precise and accurate. That seems very important. Is that a skill you can learn?

MP: It’s very important to understand, or know very well the bike. And I like this, because I go to the Ducati factory one day a week when I’m at home, because I live very close. It’s interesting to understand and work with the engineers.

Because for sure the confidence when riding the bike and the situation of checking the data, it’s impossible to compare the feeling to the data.

This is work that we all do together, because if the engineers don’t understand the rider, and the rider doesn’t understand the engineers, it’s difficult to find the good compromise, especially at this level.

And my comments are very very close or similar to the official riders. This is very important, because the work is very fast to keep the right direction. But in general, my comments are very simple. Very simple, but normally the engineers, the language of the engineers is completely different.

Q: Is it easier for the engineers to understand if your comments are simple?

MP: Yes, but sometimes my feeling or my sensation, you can’t see that in the data, because it’s the feeling you have with the asphalt, with the tire, chassis, suspension.

Q: So everything looks good on the data, but you are just feeling it’s bad?

MP: Maybe when I go in the corner, and it feels like you are going to lose the front a little bit, it’s difficult to see in the data. The engineers say, “there’s no problem with the bike”, but you won’t push because the feeling is not so good.

Q: You can go faster in theory, but you don’t because it doesn’t feel right?

MP: Because the data is the same for all rider. Maybe the lap time is 2’00, but many people with the same bike can do the same time, but not with the same setting, or the same configuration.

Because now Lorenzo is 1’58.8, and Dovi is close, but if you see the bike of Dovi and the bike of Lorenzo, they are completely different. But if you give Dovi’s bike to Lorenzo, the lap time is not the same.

Q: Do you have to test the settings of a rider, of Dovi or Lorenzo?

MP: Yes, many times. Many times I tried two different settings, because I have to test the difference, and normally it depends on the adaptation to the bike, maybe how you use the body.

My problem is this, not one season completely on the same bike. Always using Dovi settings, then Pirro settings, then Lorenzo settings. But I’m happy, because my speed improves, and this is important, because Ducati helped me a lot.

And thank you so much to Ducati, because I have this great opportunity to improve my speed, and I learned so much about the situation of the bike, of electronics.

Q: You don’t have any engineering knowledge, but you have a racer’s understanding?

MP: I only explain my feeling, my option, but at school, I wasn’t fantastic, because I didn’t like to write…

Photo: © 2013 Scott Jones / Photo.GP – All Rights Reserved

This article was originally published on MotoMatters, and is republished here on Asphalt & Rubber with permission by the author.

I feel like I always end up writing these posts while I’m stuck in an airport. Regardless, without further ado, here is your next installment of “What We’re Reading”.

Much has happened since our last post, so our reading list spans stories that go between the motorcycle industry and also non-endemic media outlets.

This edition focuses heavily on technology and the media, a topic that is of course near and dear to my heart…don’t worry, there’s still a bit of “it’s loud and goes fast” articles in here too.

Part clearinghouse for stories that we will never get our full attention, and part book club for our loyal readers who are doing their best to survive the work day, say hello to the next installment of the “What We’re Reading” column series.

“A Lap Around…” – Asphalt & Rubber

If you will allow me a brief moment for some self promotion, I wanted to highlight a series racing of stories that Steve English has been working on, where top riders describe how they get around some of the challenging tracks in the world.

So far, we have had Eugene Laverty, Jonathan Rea, and now Michael Laverty on the site to describe for us Imola, Donington Park, and Brno – and the insights that these racers share with Steve are on another level.

It is a great series so far, and I am truly enjoying it on a personal level. You should be too.

“Getting Personal: The KTM Max Hazan Built for Himself” – BikeEXIF

I have already shown some serious moto-lust for Max Hazan’s latest build, which takes a KTM 950 and turns it into track-shredding, wheelie-popping, no-good hooligan machine.

There is really nothing more to add to this, other than a good excuse to take a second-look at the machine, courtesy of our friends at BikeEXIF.

You can find older KTM v-twins on the market for cheap right now, and Hazan’s work here shows what sort of fun-machine you can make from them.

It looks delicious. Go see at BikeEXIF’s photos, stare at them in a lecherous manner, and enjoy the detailed description they got from the maker.

“Watch VW Test the I.D. R Pikes Peak Race Car Aerodynamics” – AutoBlog

Another story that I am sharing simply because I think the project is cool, Volkswagen’s I.D. R Pikes Peak race car is out to get the electric record at America’s Mountain this year.

There are a couple things here that intrigue me. First off, VW’s extensive use of rapid prototyping in order to try different aerodynamic parts – VW says close to 2,000 parts were made. That’s a lot.

The other aspect that intrigues me is the unique challenge that Pikes Peak brings to a car that relies heavily on downforce for its cornering abilities.

The rapid rise in elevation at the Pikes Peak International Hill Climb means that over the length of the course, the downforce from the car’s wings is going to change substantially.

Some really basic gorilla math shows this will be between a 25% to 33% drop in available downforce. I reiterate…that’s a lot.

This poses an interesting challenge not only to the drivers, who must constant recalibrate where is the fine line of turning and crash; but it is also a challenge to the engineers, who must find a balance of downforce at the lower sections of the course, as well as the upper sections.

“Process Takes CO₂ from the Air, Converts It to Carbon Nanotubes” – Ars Technica

What if I told you that the tailpipe on your motorcycle could one day be a carbon fiber making machine? That is the plan for researchers, who have figured out how to take the global warming CO₂ out of the air, and turn it into carbon nanotubes.

It is an intriguing idea, though not completely new. The concept has been around for a while, though it usually involves pumping the carbon deep into the earth where it becomes rock again (there has actually been a lot of progress on making this process make sense, from an energy consumption perspective).

But, why not take the carbon and do something more useful with it? That is the goal of researchers at Vanderbilt University.

Obviously it is very early days with this concept, but coupled to renewable energy resources, there is a good two-for-one proposition here with producing industrial carbon and helping curb global warming.

This article is pretty technical in its look at the concept, but it is interesting to see how scientists are looking at carbon mitigation, and basic terraforming principles.

“Facebook, Snapchat and the Dawn of the Post-Truth Era” – Wired

One of the early lines to this story really gets me: “Mark Zuckerberg, or really, his News Feed algorithm, is now editor-in-chief of the world’s content (for better or worse).” Let that sink in for a moment…

Here’s another one that grabbed me: “In our new media reality, everything is in a Rashomon effect, and real discourse becomes impossible.”

For those who aren’t into Japanese film and the work of Akira Kurosawa, Rashomon is a movie that plays on the subjective nature of truth – showing the same event from multiple perspectives, which ultimately leaves the viewer unsure of which reality to believe.

Does this sound familiar at all to our current media landscape?

Ultimately, I don’t agree with the author’s conclusion, which seems to suggest some sort of reversion back to a caveman understanding of the world, but the struggle is very real. Truth is ultimately a lie agreed upon.

Who will be making those agreements will be the future’s problem. We live in a time where we choose the facts that we want to believe – a concept that even extends into the motorcycle industry, I should point out.

We eschew expert opinions now, supplanting our own sophomoric perspectives because of an assumption that since we have the same soapbox – in this case the internet – that all opinions and experiences are therefore equal. Call it intellectual socialism, if you want.

“NASCAR’s High-Tech World: Leave Any Preconceptions Behind for This Deep-Dive” – Ars Technica

I will admit that a small part of me added this story into the list just to troll our readers. Other than its legion of fans, could there be a sporting event that is more hated than NASCAR?

The series has waned in the past few years, but it still dominates the life of a certain crop of loyal fans. For as basic and simple that turning left for a couple hours seems, the sport is in fact highly complex, and it operates at a level that is on par with F1, MotoGP, and any major ball and stick sport.

As the title suggests though, leave your preconception of NASCAR behind, and see what this sport is doing to stay modern.

There are some lessons here for motorsport of a two-wheeled variety, and while DMG may have run AMA Pro Racing into the ground, they are not devoid of good ideas.

“Canceling Roseanne Wasn’t About Conviction – It Was About Capital” – Wired

You have probably just begun to forget about Roseanne Barr’s overtly racist tweets, which lead to the canceling of her hit TV show at ABC.

So, I apologize in advance for digging up another Hollywood distraction from your consciousness, but Wired’sdissection of what goes on behind the scenes in crisis management is facinating…in a driving-by-a-train-wreck sort of way.

Hope for the best, plan for the worst is a pretty good maxim to live by, and there is an entire industry built around this concept

I like too how Wired shows how companies walk the line between between moral decisions and economic decisions – or more importantly, how moral decisions have economic impacts. I would argue that very few companies operate altruistically.

At the end of reading the story though, I’m reminded of moto-journalist Kevin Ash’s passing, at a BMW Motorrad press launch in South Africa for the BMW R1200GS. For an event that was stocked with journalists, very few details emerged about what actually happened.

It’s always bothered me, and been in the back of my mind for half a decade now…but what really lingered were the comments afterwards from a press officer from a rival brand: “that was some impressive crisis management.”

Ok, that is what we have been reading this past week. What about you? What has caught your attention? Share the links and stories that have been feeding your internet browser in the comments section, so others can enjoy and discuss them.

Lead Photo: © 2013 Jensen Beeler / Asphalt & Rubber – All Rights Reserved

The rolling hills of Brno have produced one of the most iconic circuits on the MotoGP and WorldSBK calendar, and this 5km circuit has been the home of some classic races. What goes into a fast lap though is a lot of work on your bike settings and not forcing the issue.

Max Biaggi and Marco Melandri, two former 250GP champions, have been hugely successful at the Czech track, and it’s no coincidence that both riders were schooled riding bikes that needed high corner speed.

Former MotoGP rider Michael Laverty is in Brno this weekend, and he sat down with us to talk about what goes into finding speed at the track, and what he’s seen from watching trackside on Friday.

“I really enjoy Brno, but it’s a track that you can’t attack,” said Laverty. “This is a track where you need to let it come to you and your settings are crucial. You can’t force the bike around here because it needs to turn naturally for you.”

“That’s the reason that Max Biaggi was the king here for so long, because he let the bike do the work. Max didn’t brake late into the corners and he didn’t force the bike to turn in the mid-corner, and on the exit he wasn’t sliding once he got on the gas. He was just smooth and relaxed and that’s the key.”

“With your setting you need to find a compromise, and the trail of the bike is the biggest factor here. If you increase your trail, the bike exits the corner well, but if you decrease it, you enter the corner better.”

“It’s tricky to find the sweet spot here, where you’re not losing out on either phase, and that’s why the geometry of the bike is key. This weekend the temperature has made it quite slick here, and riders are having to go a bit softer with their settings to try and find some rear grip.”

“Brno is typically a very high-grip track, you could see that in the rain where riders were committing very aggressively to turning in, but it’s greasy this weekend for some reason. The grip drops away here after a few laps, but then stays very consistent.”

“You can get a couple of fast laps out of a tire, but then the grip drops and you lose some time. It’s a high-grip track, but you can’t drag a lap time out of the bikes, and you really need to let it come to you through the bike settings.”

From standing trackside Laverty was able to see the difference between riders, and he was surprised that Friday pace-setter Jonathan Rea was able to ride so aggressively.

The Kawasaki is clearly very sorted for Rea, but the grip that he enjoys has allowed him to take a different approach to the normal service at Brno.

“Johnny rides the Kawasaki very differently to everyone else. He’s very aggressive on the bike compared to others here, and whereas you typically need to carry the corner speed and be smooth, here with Johnny he’s attacking the corner and making a ‘V’ out of each section.”

“It’s different to the rest, and when he has grip he’s fantastic, but when you use the rear tire to turn the bike it can be difficult to keep doing that when the grip drops. Using the rear to hook the bike puts a lot of strain on the rear tire, but usually Johnny and Pere Riba are on top of that.”

“From watching trackside, there’s some riders who are being aggressive with the rear, but they don’t have the grip from the rear tire.”

“It’ll be interesting to see what changes on Saturday because a lot of teams were trying to manage their problems with the electronics and for some bikes, Ducati for example, it’s very aggressive when their electronics cut off the power because they only have two cylinders.”

“If you have more cylinders you can control the pulses better without upsetting the bike as much. Watching Ducati, they were suffering from a lot of electronic intrusion whereas Kawasaki could manage it better.”

“Johnny was the only rider attacking the corners from the start, whereas everyone else was trying to carry rolling speed through the turns, but that changed as the day went on.”

The 5.4km layout features a series of “S bends” that characterize the track, and as a very wide circuit, it offers plenty of variety for lines and riders can attack one another.

For Laverty, one of the keys to the weekend will be that Kawasaki and Rea seem to be able to use the low-end torque of their engine to pull the bike out of the second gear corners better than their rivals.

“Most bikes, only Johnny and the Yamaha’s didn’t, are in second and third gear through the stadium. Johnny can comfortably hold second all the way through here and still has enough torque to pull out of the corners.”

“This section was always taken in second for everyone, but the new rev limits have clearly changed that. You exit the stadium, and you’re up to fifth down the hill before coming back to second again for the right-hander.”

“The rev limits have changed some of the character here, because there are some corners where the bike will be a little lazy because you set your gearing for the straights and the big tire also is affecting this.”

“The gearing is a bigger compromise here compared to in the past, so you need to have that torque in the low revs, and that seems to be a big advantage for Kawasaki at the moment.”

Whether that advantage holds for Saturday remains to be seen, but the tire life is sure to be crucial this weekend. Brno isn’t offering the same grip as usual, and being able to make the tire work for the race distance will be key.

This World Superbike story is made possible by our A&R Pro members. If you like reading WorldSBK stories on Asphalt & Rubber, you should consider supporting this content by signing up for A&R Pro.

If you were reading other moto-news sites this week – first of all, shame on you – then you would have noticed much noise being made about Ford Motor Company applying for a patent on detection technology for when a motorcycle is lane-splitting between cars.

What you didn’t notice, along with those other publications, is that this is nothing new from Ford, as the American automobile manufacturer was already granted a patent for this technology over a year ago.

Much ado about nothing? Not quite, but the story isn’t remotely close to what was being reported elsewhere. In fact, this news of Ford’s lane-splitting patent strategy is much bigger, and much more important, than what has been in the media thus far.

To understand this, one has to ask themselves why Ford would want two different patents for essentially the same technology?

The two patents are very, very similar in their claims, graphics, and wording, but they use two different methods for detecting and tracking a potentially lane-splitting motorcycle, both visually and audibly (there is an argument here that loud pipes may in fact save lives after all).

A strong reason for all this is because Ford is attempting to corner the marketplace for detecting a lane-splitting motorcycle, nailing down as many variations on the detection technology that the USPTO will deem unique and legal. Hence, the second patent application.

This is a smart move by Ford, as autonomous vehicles can’t truly be autonomous if it lacks the ability to detect motorcycles lane-splitting next to them.

In the United States, this issue is real, but less of a concern, as it will only apply to drivers in California. Though, we should note that California is the largest automobile market in the United States.

However, Ford is surely going to apply these patents in foreign markets as well, through WIPO, where lane-splitting detection will be a more critical piece of technology.

Through a clever intellectual property strategy, Ford’s current patents, patent application, and likely future patents could corner the market on this core piece of technology, forcing other manufacturers to license Ford’s lane-splitting methods.

Conversely, Ford could hold onto the technology for itself, giving the American company a leg-up on the competition with its autonomous vehicle offerings.

Either way you look at it, there is a technology war going on right now, which is very quietly being fought behind the scenes for our roadways. In it, Ford just laid down a strong amount of covering fire, as it shifts its position. As such, it will be interesting to see how other brands respond.

Source: USPTO

A thank you to our bevy of loyal readers who sent us tips about this story!

Mark this day, because today is the day that Aprilia Racing signed Andrea Iannone to its factory MotoGP – the Italian motorcycle brand sealing its fate to the Italian rider for the next two seasons.

The news had been expected, for quite some time, and today when we saw Suzuki Racing formally ending its relationship with Iannone, we knew it was only a matter of time before Aprilia announced its contract.

Iannone’s third factory team in the MotoGP paddock, it will be interesting to see what he can accomplish with his teammate Aleix Espargaró at Aprilia – a team that is still struggling for results in the MotoGP Championship.

“With Iannone, we have another highly talented and fast rider who is also demonstrating his value this season,” said Aprilia Racing Manager Romano Albesiano.

“His arrival is a sign of the Piaggio Group and Aprilia’s growing commitment to the MotoGP programme, where our bike has already demonstrated that it can rely on a valid technical base.”

“Now we need to stay focused on the 2018 season, beginning from the next GP of Barcelona. We have a strong team that has never stopped working hard.”

“We want to keep growing and take the RS-GP where it deserves to be this season, which is still long, with Aleix and Scott, speaking of whom, I wish to thank publicly for his great professionalism and for his consistently high level of commitment.”

Today’s news of course means that Scott Redding will leave the Aprilia Racing team at the end of the 2018 season. This is no surprise, as the British rider has had a miserable season on the Aprilia RS-GP so far.

In fact, the year’s results are so bad, Redding is widely expected to be without a MotoGP ride next season, with talk of him perhaps headed to the World Superbike Championship. More on that, as we get it.

Source: Aprilia Racing